Maintenance assessment on performance management

model_3_6
model_3_6model_2_1307913069results_ma_if6_3results_ma_if6_1results_ma_if6_2


Price: Free

Chose your options before adding the service to the cart ?
*

Industrial Maintenance
Maintenance performance management
Are your maintenance data, Kpi, visual boards, management meetings and actions well managed?
Focused and in-depth evaluation based on best practices
Scope: Industrial Maintenance focused on Maintenance performance management
Industries: Automated or semi-automated production
Specific analysis: Integrated preventive maturity

Are your maintenance data, Kpi, visual boards, management meetings and actions well managed?

Number of best practice evaluations 26
Time to complete 30 - 60 mins
Multi Level analysis  
 
Optional anonymity  
 
Consolidated results  
 
Specific features
  • Integrated Preventive Maturity
Languages available

English ?

Focused and in-depth assessment of the Performance sterring of a maintenance function within all industries of any size in particular tailored for those that have manufacturing sites with automatised or semi – automatised production lines. The evaluation provides a targeted diagnostic against world best practices in maintenance, looking at:

  • Steering Systems
  • Performance indicators

The assessment provides multi-level analysis on several axis: by individual or consolidated area of best practice, by organisation dimension (geographical location, department, production area, hierarchical level or any other dimension depending on your organisation), by evaluator, by action driver known as the integrated Preventative Maturity

The results are provided in a concise and detailed (if option selected) report with multiple graphs and allowing you to clearly identify areas of improvement as well as perform internal or even external* benchmarks
 

Scope and industries

This service is tailored for:

  • all industries that have manufacturing sites with automatized or semi – automatized production lines; this include manufactured products and processed products.
  • focused on the maintenance performance management (KPIs, decision meetings, actions follow-up, pdca...)

Who For

Company Production or maintenance senior manager, Production site manager, Production manager, Maintenance manager, internal consultants (e.g. continuous improvement team) or external consultants

 

Highlights

More than 25 best practices evaluations focused on maintenance performance management, structured in 2 categories and 6 areas, enabling to identify strengths and improvement opportunities in a detailed and a consolidated view

  • Evaluation according to an Integrated Preventative Maturity model, that is not only evaluating the practices directly linked to the Maintenance policy, but all the categories and areas of maintenance
  • Normative questions with precise and auditable criteria (check with evaluated organisation data) enabling objective evaluation
  • Ability to create own organisation dimension (functional, geographical, hierarchical, or even particular organisational entity) enabling to compare evaluations:
    • of the same system (the practices, tools, organisation set up) used by or applied to different people
    • of different systems used in the various organisational areas or units of the evaluated organisation (e.g. different geographical sites)
  • Evaluations can be kept anonymous


How long does it take?

Since it is a focused assessment, it takes around 45 – 90 mins by evaluator to fill all the questions in a meaningful way. The questionnaire can be recorded and answered in several sessions

Result report

The result report is accessible once the evaluations are completed and contains graphical and text results. There are two options defining the level of analysis details displayed in the report.
Summary analysis: 
  • Answers by question with average performance for scored questions
  • Overall result scoring displayed in a chart
  • Analysis of the results difference between the top level questionnaire categories
  • Comments by evaluator
Detailed analysis:
  • Detailed answers by participant
  • Answers by question with average performance for scored questions
  • Answers by question and by participant with performance by participant for scored questions
  • Heatmap of the results, with category and subcategory performance levels
  • Performance levels by category with breakdown by subcategory
  • Performance levels by category and evaluator
  • Performance levels by category and organisational dimension (custom)
  • Performance levels by custom driver
  • Comments by evaluator


Number of participants

This is the maximum number of participants who can be invited and answer the questionnaire for a specific analysis or survey


Downloadable results

When chosen, enables to:
  • download the full result file in Excel
  • download chart data in Excel or print chart images
  • dowload results comments or specific requested data


Wevalgo Maintenance Performance steering InFocus Model on maintenance management


 
Maintenance

A model built on practical experience of best practices

As with all Wevalgo off the shelf services, this model is built on the extensive management consulting experience of international Maintenance practices; each of its best practice has been observed in real conditions.


More than 25 best practices in a structured model

The model is structured in three categories and eight areas, each area includes 3 – 10 detailed best practices; this structure enables to identify strengths and improvement opportunities at different levels, from a high level and holistic view to a detailed view. It looks in depth at the Planning and prioritization controls in place in the Maintenance function in particular compared to best practices comparable across multiple sites and/or others in the same industries and other industries.


Normative questions

For each best practice, the question is very precise and the answers choices are almost systematically normed to facilitate the evaluation and mostly to avoid subjectivity

For example, some evaluations use a norm derived from CMMI; for others we have defined specific norms.

According to the practices, evaluation criteria used are, for example:

  • formalisation and detailed level,
  • quality and scope coverage,
  • people ownership and effective usage level,
  • roles and responsibilities clarity.

 

 

Integrated Preventive Maturity Model

We have built a model to assess where is your maintenance in the journey that goes from being organised to be predictive in four stages as described below. Performance, kpi and data management practice evaluation integrate this model.

Stage

Description of the stage

Organise

The maintenance has defined processes and methodologies and applies mostly a corrective type of maintenance

Plan and coordinate

There is a defined strategy and maintenance policy per type of equipment, with planned Preventative maintenance and with Total productive maintenance principles partially implemented.

Maintenance uses planning tools and conducts some improvement plans including reliability actions

There is a good coordination with other functions

Analyse and prevent

Key Performance indicators are used to steer maintenance organisation.

There is a strong usage of data analysis (equipment performance analysis and failure root cause) to define equipment criticality, condition-based maintenance, reliability programmes

Predict

There is a strong usage of statistical data analysis and mathematical modelling; artificial intelligence starts to be introduced.

 

In most maintenance maturity model, there is an evaluation of how preventative or predictive is the maintenance organisation; but it is in often limited to the maintenance policy area.

The additional value of our model is it is integrated with each maintenance area : each maintenance area is assessed with criteria belonging to this model as pictured below (strategy area example ).

 Integrated Preventive Maturity Model

 

 

Get instant and full access to reports as soon as evaluations are completed.

Gain multi-level analysis on several axis that can be explored in varied depths and dimensions through a user friendly results menu. A few samples of the results report are shown below

Heat map
Visualise the performance and their drivers at a glance across all categories and sub-categories
results-MA-IF6-1.PNG
Results by organisational dimension
Compare performance across your own, relevant and entirely customisable organisational dimensions. For example by geographical locations, departments, hierarchical levels or any other you see fit. Zoom in to breakdowns by category, subcategory and/or question
results-MA-IF6-2.PNG
Results by evaluator and category
You can see detailed results to better understand the causes of your organisation performance
results-MA-IF6-3.PNG

To see a full example of report result,

We have expert consultants on hand to build their own evaluations, assist you and interpret your results. Select the Expert Review option on the purchase menu.

Key steps

after purchase and activation of the service, the key steps are the following:

  • Customisation of the service to the organisation by the service manager*
    • Service name, title and introduction for the participants invited
    • Selection of participants to the service
    • Definition of dimension to enable analysis by organisation dimension (optional)
    • Selection of anonymity option
  • Sending of an invitation link to the selected participants<
  • Evaluations performed by selected participants, on the Wevalgo web platform<
    • Participants connect to Wevalgo web site thanks to the link sent by the service manager
    • Participants answer on-line
    • The service manager can follow up the answers progress status

* The service manager is the person who purchased the service. 



Recommended participants

For this evaluation we recommend the following participants: 

  • The Production site director
  • The site production and maintenance managers
  • A selection of key production managers or experts, knowledgeable of the maintenance operations, in particular the autonomous maintenance, the work-order process and the common meetings with maintenance
  • In case of several geographical sites, a selection of each site managers, enabling to compare the practices between the different sites.


Technical Requirements

In order to use the services, the technical environment must comply with the requirements below. 

Browser requirements
  • Chrome: 62 and above
  • Internet Explorer: 11 and above
  • Safari: 10 and above
  • Firefox: 45 and above
  • Opera: 42 and above
Other
  • desktop or laptop usage, no mobile version
  • javascript enabled
  • Firewall authorising Wevalgo website 

If you choose to use other browsers or settings other than the ones listed here, the site's pages may not display properly, and you may encounter problems that Customer Service may not be able to resolve.

These technical requirements apply to all the participants of the service.